Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible...

"Jeff Kenton" <JeffKenton@attbi.com>
8 Nov 2002 11:04:48 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2002-11-07)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... vugluskr@unicorn.math.spbu.ru (Roman Shaposhnick) (2002-11-07)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... gsc@zip.com.au (Sean Case) (2002-11-08)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... stanley.chow@cloakware.com (Stanley Chow) (2002-11-08)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) (2002-11-08)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... gopi@sankhya.com (Gopi Bulusu) (2002-11-08)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... JeffKenton@attbi.com (Jeff Kenton) (2002-11-08)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2002-11-12)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... enrico.santoemma@mail.com (Enrico Santoemma) (2002-11-15)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira Baxter) (2002-11-17)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... kgw-news@stiscan.com (2002-11-17)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Jeff Kenton" <JeffKenton@attbi.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 8 Nov 2002 11:04:48 -0500
Organization: AT&T Broadband
References: 02-11-013
Keywords: translator
Posted-Date: 08 Nov 2002 11:04:48 EST

socrates wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> There is a computer language that has been dead for over a decade.
> However, there are numerous programs that have been built using this
> dead language.
>
> Now my "pending task" will be to make a translator that converts this
> dead language to an object-oriented language like java.


What is this language?


It's probably possible. Having the manual is a good start. Having sample
programs is useful, especially if there are reasonable comments. (People
used to comment their code -- it seems to be a lost art now.)


You have two ways to go:


    * Translate to an existing language that has comparable syntax and features.
    * Compile it directly to Java byte code (or assembly code).


In either case, up front analysis and design is half the battle (assuming you
know something about compilers/translators in general). Do that part well, and
the rest of your job is easier.


Good luck.


jeff


--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Jeff Kenton http://home.attbi.com/~jeffkenton =


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.