Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible...

kgw-news@stiscan.com
17 Nov 2002 23:16:33 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[6 earlier articles]
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) (2002-11-08)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... gopi@sankhya.com (Gopi Bulusu) (2002-11-08)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... JeffKenton@attbi.com (Jeff Kenton) (2002-11-08)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2002-11-12)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... enrico.santoemma@mail.com (Enrico Santoemma) (2002-11-15)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira Baxter) (2002-11-17)
Re: Building a translator. Want to know if this is feasible... kgw-news@stiscan.com (2002-11-17)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: kgw-news@stiscan.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 17 Nov 2002 23:16:33 -0500
Organization: Solution Technology
References: 02-11-013 02-11-085
Keywords: translator
Posted-Date: 17 Nov 2002 23:16:32 EST

On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 05:39:29 UTC, "Enrico Santoemma" <enrico.santoemma@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
> The schematic example helps me to support my opinion: we should change
> the monodimensional view of a text source code for some bidimensional
> views, which is 1 to 1 representation of the code.


What, like UML or flowcharts?


Using indenting instead of {} or the sort has been tried. Turns into
a mess when it is wrong. No way to tell what was ment or where.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.