From: | "Roman Shaposhnick" <vugluskr@unicorn.math.spbu.ru> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 7 Nov 2002 00:53:01 -0500 |
Organization: | St.Petersburg University |
References: | 02-11-013 |
Keywords: | translator |
Posted-Date: | 07 Nov 2002 00:53:00 EST |
On 6 Nov 2002 11:47:41 -0500, socrates wrote:
>What I have is very minimal. No compiler for the dead language, no
>text books, only one reference manual and hundreds of program codes
>that used the dead language.
Phew! You must be feeling like Champollion when he was deciphering
Rosetta Stone ;)
>Do you think it's possible to build a translator with such minimal
>resources? And could you give me some pointers on how to start
>building a translator?
I assume you at least understand what those programs written in the
dead language were supposed to do. But let me ask you first, what's
the purpose of writing a translator then ? Is it only to 'port'
those programs ? If so, how big they are ?
If I were you I'd seriously consider rewriting them manually, because
with the requirements you have -- I doubt anyone would be able to
write reasonable translator.
Thanks,
Roman.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.