From: | George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Sat, 03 Sep 2011 16:00:18 -0400 |
Organization: | A noiseless patient Spider |
References: | 11-08-006 11-08-007 11-08-029 11-08-030 11-09-003 11-09-004 |
Keywords: | courses, C, code |
Posted-Date: | 03 Sep 2011 18:36:32 EDT |
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 06:43:30 +0100, Philip Herron
<redbrain@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>As for the backend outputting to C thread here, i dont recommend this
>as i personally believe it will push you to produce bad IL and
>middle-end code because you will rely too much on C.
As a back end for a compiler I would agree with this. However, by
coincidence, in another forum I am involved in a discussion regarding
embedding a parser generator into a device so that its comm interface
can be reconfigured or extended in the field by the end user.
(There actually is a good reason for wanting to provide this 8-)
Because most parser tools generate C source, the issue of embedding a
C compiler also came up.
>--Phil
George
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.