From: | Volker Birk <bumens@dingens.org> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:02:01 +0000 (UTC) |
Organization: | [ posted via ] IN-Ulm |
References: | 11-08-006 11-08-007 11-08-029 |
Keywords: | translator, C |
Posted-Date: | 31 Aug 2011 09:33:40 EDT |
Joe keane <jgk@panix.com> wrote:
> Volker Birk <bumens@dingens.org> writes:
>>If you want to compile a programming language to assembler code
> I'm not sure why anyone would want to do this; if you have another
> language you can convert it to C code, and concentrate on what you are
> doing. If you find that the C->assembly step can be improved that is
> also useful.
Well, for example in a C compiler ;-)
If we're talking about compiling to machine code today, usually we're
using a framework like GCC or LLVM anyways.
Yours,
VB.
--
Wenn Du fC<r eine Leistung nichts bezahlst,
bist Du nicht der Kunde, sondern die Ware.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.