Related articles |
---|
Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers samhng@gmail.com (=?iso-8859-1?B?bW9vcJk=?=) (2006-09-25) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-09-26) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers snicol@apk.net (Scott Nicol) (2006-09-26) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-09-26) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers tom@infoether.com (Tom Copeland) (2006-09-28) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers napi@axiomsol.com (napi) (2006-09-28) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers rmathew@gmail.com (Ranjit Mathew) (2006-09-28) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers martin_filteau@yahoo.ca (Martin Filteau) (2006-09-28) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers spamers.sollen.sterben@cablenet.de (VergissMeinNicht) (2006-09-28) |
From: | Ranjit Mathew <rmathew@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 28 Sep 2006 22:50:36 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 06-09-138 |
Keywords: | parse, GCC |
Posted-Date: | 28 Sep 2006 22:50:36 EDT |
> PGs have a great convenince over hand written parsers, but they also
> slow in speed and hard to read the generated code. I wonder besides
> these two obvious factors, what else hand written parsers are better
> than PGs? Thank you!
Despite the proclaimed benefits in this thread of a tool-generated
parser over a hand-crafted parser, the GCC hackers seem inclined to
move towards hand-crafted parsers. Both the C++ and the C front-ends
were converted to use hand-crafted parsers in recent times. The
following messages provide some of the reasons:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-10/msg00573.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-10/msg00574.html
Thanks,
Ranjit.
- --
Ranjit Mathew Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com
Bangalore, INDIA. Web: http://rmathew.com/
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.