Related articles |
---|
Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers samhng@gmail.com (=?iso-8859-1?B?bW9vcJk=?=) (2006-09-25) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-09-26) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers snicol@apk.net (Scott Nicol) (2006-09-26) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-09-26) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers tom@infoether.com (Tom Copeland) (2006-09-28) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers napi@axiomsol.com (napi) (2006-09-28) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers rmathew@gmail.com (Ranjit Mathew) (2006-09-28) |
Re: Parser Generated vs. Hand Written Parsers martin_filteau@yahoo.ca (Martin Filteau) (2006-09-28) |
[1 later articles] |
From: | Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 26 Sep 2006 01:05:15 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 06-09-138 |
Keywords: | parse |
Posted-Date: | 26 Sep 2006 01:05:15 EDT |
moop wrote:
> PGs have a great convenince over hand written parsers, but they also
> slow in speed and hard to read the generated code. I wonder besides
> these two obvious factors, what else hand written parsers are better
> than PGs? Thank you!
I think that you mean recursive descent parsers, when you mention hand
written parsers. These parsers typically correspond to LL(k) grammars
(k ~1), with the according restrictions vs. LR(k) grammars and
generated bottom-up parser automatons.
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.