Related articles |
---|
dynamic bintrans jrydberg@night.trouble.net (Johan Rydberg) (2003-11-21) |
Re: dynamic bintrans toby@telegraphics.com.au (2003-12-03) |
Re: dynamic bintrans brown@cs.bris.ac.uk (Julian Brown) (2003-12-03) |
Re: dynamic bintrans toby@telegraphics.com.au (2003-12-03) |
Re: dynamic bintrans j.troeger@qut.edu.au (Jens Troeger) (2003-12-13) |
Re: dynamic bintrans j.troeger@qut.edu.au (Jens Troeger) (2003-12-13) |
From: | toby@telegraphics.com.au (Toby Thain) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 3 Dec 2003 20:25:35 -0500 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
References: | 03-11-080 |
Keywords: | translator |
Posted-Date: | 03 Dec 2003 20:25:35 EST |
Johan Rydberg <jrydberg@night.trouble.net> wrote
> I'm interested in dynamic binary translation. I've done some small
> tests of my own, and they work pretty good. Now I want to make the
> compiler retargetable. For this, I have to choose an IR that can
> describe targets which has specific characteristics (such as delay
> slots, condition codes (x86), condition insns (arm, ia-64), ..).
>
> Standard RTL, such as used by GCC, seems to be too generic to
> describe for example the condition codes on x86. It also has
> troubles describing conditional insns.
>
> Anyone that has any ideas, or can give me some pointers to papers
> regarding this topic?
Some references:
* http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~cristina/uqbt.html
* http://www.program-transformation.org/twiki/bin/view/Transform/BinaryTranslationResearch
* http://www.cs.virginia.edu/zephyr/csdl/lrtl.html
* http://www.experimentalstuff.com/Technologies/Walkabout/
Toby
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.