Related articles |
---|
dynamic bintrans jrydberg@night.trouble.net (Johan Rydberg) (2003-11-21) |
Re: dynamic bintrans toby@telegraphics.com.au (2003-12-03) |
Re: dynamic bintrans brown@cs.bris.ac.uk (Julian Brown) (2003-12-03) |
Re: dynamic bintrans toby@telegraphics.com.au (2003-12-03) |
Re: dynamic bintrans j.troeger@qut.edu.au (Jens Troeger) (2003-12-13) |
Re: dynamic bintrans j.troeger@qut.edu.au (Jens Troeger) (2003-12-13) |
From: | Johan Rydberg <jrydberg@night.trouble.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 21 Nov 2003 00:42:48 -0500 |
Organization: | Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden |
Keywords: | translator, question |
Posted-Date: | 21 Nov 2003 00:42:48 EST |
Hi,
I'm interested in dynamic binary translation. I've done some small
tests of my own, and they work pretty good. Now I want to make the
compiler retargetable. For this, I have to choose an IR that can
describe targets which has specific characteristics (such as delay
slots, condition codes (x86), condition insns (arm, ia-64), ..).
Standard RTL, such as used by GCC, seems to be too generic to
describe for example the condition codes on x86. It also has
troubles describing conditional insns.
Anyone that has any ideas, or can give me some pointers to papers
regarding this topic?
brgds
johan
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.