Related articles |
---|
C++ parser front end kullbach@uni-koblenz.de (Bernt Kullbach) (1999-10-13) |
Re: C++ parser front end rvs@sparc.spb.su (1999-10-14) |
Re: C++ parser front end bowdidge@apple.com (Robert Bowdidge) (1999-10-14) |
Re: C++ parser front end wfahle@airmail.net (Bill Fahle) (1999-10-14) |
Re: C++ parser front end dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org (1999-10-14) |
Re: C++ parser front end grosch@cocolab.de (1999-10-16) |
From: | "Bill Fahle" <wfahle@airmail.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 14 Oct 1999 01:25:13 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 99-10-064 |
Keywords: | parse, C++, comment |
I researched this about a year and a half ago, and I found the same thing
you did. EDG is really the only viable option (although hugely expensive as
noted; one must consider the number of man-years that have gone into
it/would go into developing your own. We started out developing our own, and
gave up about the time we saw:
template <T> class temp {
T::obj;
};
The PCCTS-based C++ parser needs tons of work. EDG does seem to work in most
cases.
Bernt Kullbach <kullbach@uni-koblenz.de> wrote in message
> I now have been looking for C++ parser front ends for some time.
[What about the C++ parser that egcs uses? -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.