Re: Functional OO

Lutz Hamel <hamel@Think.COM>
30 Apr 1996 23:55:15 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Functional OO mtimmerm@microstar.com (1996-04-29)
Re: Functional OO hamel@Think.COM (Lutz Hamel) (1996-04-30)
Re: Functional OO graham.matthews@wintermute.anu.edu.au (Graham Matthews) (1996-04-30)
Re: Functional OO ranjit@fwasted.zk3.dec.com (1996-05-01)
Re: Functional OO patrick_d_logan@ccm.hf.intel.com (Patrick Logan) (1996-05-01)
Re: Functional OO iainf@bristol.st.com (1996-05-06)
Re: Functional OO hans@iesd.auc.dk (Hans Huttel) (1996-05-10)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Lutz Hamel <hamel@Think.COM>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.compilers
Date: 30 Apr 1996 23:55:15 -0400
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
Distribution: inet
Keywords: OOP, functional

Matt wrote:
>Is there any known notion of functional object oriented semantics? Is
>there any side-effect free language that could be called object
>oriented?


Yes, the Declarative Group at the Computing Lab at Oxford University
has been exploring these concepts for a number of years. They have
developed a functional oo language called FOOPS. For more information
please take a look at their home page:


http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/groups/declarative/decl.html


- Lutz
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.