Functional OO

mtimmerm@microstar.com (Matt Timmermans)
29 Apr 1996 23:32:30 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Functional OO mtimmerm@microstar.com (1996-04-29)
Re: Functional OO hamel@Think.COM (Lutz Hamel) (1996-04-30)
Re: Functional OO graham.matthews@wintermute.anu.edu.au (Graham Matthews) (1996-04-30)
Re: Functional OO ranjit@fwasted.zk3.dec.com (1996-05-01)
Re: Functional OO patrick_d_logan@ccm.hf.intel.com (Patrick Logan) (1996-05-01)
Re: Functional OO iainf@bristol.st.com (1996-05-06)
Re: Functional OO hans@iesd.auc.dk (Hans Huttel) (1996-05-10)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: mtimmerm@microstar.com (Matt Timmermans)
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.compilers
Date: 29 Apr 1996 23:32:30 -0400
Organization: Microstar Software Ltd.
Distribution: inet
Keywords: OOP, functional, question

Is there any known notion of functional object oriented semantics? Is
there any side-effect free language that could be called object
oriented?


I know there are difficulties with such an idea, but are these two
paradigms inherently incompatible?


</Matt>


--------------------------------------------------------------
Matt Timmermans | Phone: +1 613 596-2233
Microstar Software Ltd. | Fax: +1 613 596-5934
3775 Richmond Rd. | E-mail: mtimmerm@microstar.com
Nepean Ontario CANADA K2H 5B7 | http://www.microstar.com
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.