Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| compiler back-end development? madeeha@gmail.com (mj) (2009-07-10) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? cmeerw@cmeerw.org (Christof Meerwald) (2009-07-11) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? tc@cs.bath.ac.uk (Tom Crick) (2009-07-11) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2009-07-12) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? jacob@nospam.org (jacob navia) (2009-07-13) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? ian@airs.com (Ian Lance Taylor) (2009-07-13) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB) (2009-07-13) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2009-07-14) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? rogers.email@gmail.com (Ian Rogers) (2009-07-14) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2009-07-14) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? toby@telegraphics.com.au (toby) (2009-07-15) |
| [2 later articles] |
| From: | jacob navia <jacob@nospam.org> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:38:59 +0200 |
| Organization: | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| References: | 09-07-013 09-07-015 09-07-020 |
| Keywords: | GCC, lcc |
| Posted-Date: | 14 Jul 2009 09:36:01 EDT |
BGB / cr88192 wrote:
>
> but, yes, it would be better to have GCC working, but for now I have ended
> up using MSVC as my backend (static) compiler (when doing 64-bit stuff...).
>
lcc-win64 has 64 bit support.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.