Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| [4 earlier articles] |
| Re: compiler back-end development? jacob@nospam.org (jacob navia) (2009-07-13) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? ian@airs.com (Ian Lance Taylor) (2009-07-13) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB) (2009-07-13) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2009-07-14) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? rogers.email@gmail.com (Ian Rogers) (2009-07-14) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2009-07-14) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? toby@telegraphics.com.au (toby) (2009-07-15) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? rogers.email@gmail.com (Ian Rogers) (2009-07-17) |
| Re: compiler back-end development? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2009-07-17) |
| From: | toby <toby@telegraphics.com.au> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:30:59 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 09-07-013 09-07-015 09-07-020 09-07-026 09-07-033 |
| Keywords: | C |
| Posted-Date: | 15 Jul 2009 19:25:47 EDT |
On Jul 14, 10:30 am, "BGB / cr88192" <cr88...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "jacob navia" <ja...@nospam.org> wrote in message
> > BGB / cr88192 wrote:
>
> >> but, yes, it would be better to have GCC working, but for now I have
> >> ended
> >> up using MSVC as my backend (static) compiler (when doing 64-bit
> >> stuff...).
>
> > lcc-win64 has 64 bit support.
> ...
> GCC and MSVC are "safer" bets, although in this case, GCC exhibited some
> bugs that made me rather uncertain about using it, leading me to use MSVC
> despite it being much less convinient.
MS VC++ Express Edition (free-as-in-beer download) runs fine on Linux
under WINE, for any of its 32 or 64-bit targets. You can use make or
NMAKE to script builds, and even an IDE like Eclipse if the fancy
takes you.
--Toby
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.