Re: Software Pipelining

Tim Frink <plfriko@yahoo.de>
16 Sep 2008 21:41:53 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re:Software Pipelining plfriko@yahoo.de (Tim Frink) (2008-08-28)
Re: Software Pipelining pertti.kellomaki@tut.fi (Pertti Kellomaki) (2008-08-29)
Re: Software Pipelining mr.neeraj@gmail.com (Neeraj Goel) (2008-09-02)
Re: Software Pipelining sidtouati@inria.fr (Touati Sid) (2008-09-08)
Re: Software Pipelining kamalpr@hp.com (kamal) (2008-09-10)
Re: Software Pipelining johnhull2008@gmail.com (johnhull2008) (2008-09-11)
Re: Software Pipelining plfriko@yahoo.de (Tim Frink) (2008-09-16)
Re: Software Pipelining plfriko@yahoo.de (Tim Frink) (2008-09-16)
Re: Software Pipelining pertti.kellomaki@tut.fi (Pertti Kellomaki) (2008-09-17)
Re: Software Pipelining cdg@nullstone.com (Christopher Glaeser) (2008-09-21)
Re: Software Pipelining armelasselin@hotmail.com (Armel) (2008-09-24)
Software pipelining napi@rangkom.MY (1991-07-04)
Re: Software pipelining pardo@gar.cs.washington.edu (1991-07-19)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Tim Frink <plfriko@yahoo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 16 Sep 2008 21:41:53 GMT
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-08-072 08-08-086 08-08-092 08-09-056
Keywords: optimize
Posted-Date: 17 Sep 2008 07:57:35 EDT

>> And if profiling might be exploited here.
>
> I didn't get you there i.e. profiling doesn't seem related to
> pipelining as described above.


This was just a question if it would make sense to somehow
combine software pipelining with the most frequently executed
path (determined by profiling). I can't imagine any useful
combination of these two techniques, but maybe there are some?


Regards,
Tim


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.