Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM

kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk
Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:48:22 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM blog@rivadpm.com (Alex McDonald) (2007-09-13)
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM lkrupp@pssw.com (Louis Krupp) (2007-09-13)
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-09-13)
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-09-13)
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM jvorbrueggen@not-mediasec.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Vorbr=FCggen?=) (2007-09-14)
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM blog@rivadpm.com (Alex McDonald) (2007-09-14)
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk (2007-09-14)
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM jeffrey.kenton@comcast.net (Jeff Kenton) (2007-09-16)
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2007-09-16)
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2007-10-01)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:48:22 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 07-09-049
Keywords: storage

DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) wrote:


> Forth has no local variables (for recursive calls),


  Local variables are in the Forth Standard, optional word set IIRC.


  Ken Young


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.