Related articles |
---|
Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM jirik.svoboda@seznam.cz (Jiri Svoboda) (2007-09-11) |
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-09-13) |
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM blog@rivadpm.com (Alex McDonald) (2007-09-13) |
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM lkrupp@pssw.com (Louis Krupp) (2007-09-13) |
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-09-13) |
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-09-13) |
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM jvorbrueggen@not-mediasec.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Vorbr=FCggen?=) (2007-09-14) |
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM blog@rivadpm.com (Alex McDonald) (2007-09-14) |
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk (2007-09-14) |
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM jeffrey.kenton@comcast.net (Jeff Kenton) (2007-09-16) |
Re: Optimizing stack access for a stack based VM dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2007-09-16) |
[1 later articles] |
From: | Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:31:31 +0200 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 07-09-030 07-09-042 |
Keywords: | storage, optimize |
Posted-Date: | 13 Sep 2007 22:53:40 EDT |
Alex McDonald wrote:
>>There are separate address space for (1) code, (2) data, (3) stack.
>
> The separation between code and data isn't required in Forth (although
> there may be advantages in certain architectures that treat each space
> differently, or don't like mixing of code and data).
IMO Forth is not a direct solution for the OP, since...
> "Variables" in Forth are words that push their addresses on the stack,
> as in the @ and ! example given above. Forth also has a value, or a
> self fetching variable.
Forth has no local variables (for recursive calls), the implementation
of e.g. loop counters requires two separate stacks, for data and
return addresses. Calling subroutines (Forth: compiled words) for the
retrieval of references to variables IMO also is overkill, in a VM
other than the Forth machine itself.
Nonetheless Forth is a source of inspiration, for everybody who wants
to learn more about really uncommon virtual machines :-)
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.