Related articles |
---|
Free x86 C compiler wanted js.stoezel@gmail.com (Jean-Sebastien Stoezel) (2007-04-06) |
Re: Free x86 C compiler wanted ArarghMail704@Arargh.com (2007-04-06) |
Re: Free x86 C compiler wanted DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-04-06) |
Re: Free x86 C compiler wanted cmeerw@cmeerw.org (Christof Meerwald) (2007-04-06) |
Re: Free x86 C compiler wanted cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2007-04-06) |
Re: Free x86 C compiler wanted gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2007-04-06) |
Re: Free x86 C compiler wanted DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-04-08) |
Re: Free x86 C compiler wanted gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2007-04-08) |
Re: Free x86 C compiler wanted nmh@t3x.org (Nils M Holm) (2007-04-08) |
Re: Free x86 C compiler wanted ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2007-04-11) |
Re: Free x86 C compiler wanted gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2007-04-11) |
Re: Free x86 C compiler wanted lpsantil@gmail.com (lpsantil@gmail.com) (2007-04-13) |
[1 later articles] |
From: | George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 6 Apr 2007 22:59:58 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 07-04-015 07-04-019 |
Keywords: | C |
Posted-Date: | 06 Apr 2007 22:59:58 EDT |
On 6 Apr 2007 00:46:11 -0400, ArarghMail704@Arargh.com wrote:
>>I am looking for a free C compiler supporting 186 processors. ...
>
>If you want to generate COM files with msvc, try versions 5.1, 6, 7,
>or 8. 10 is 386+ only, and I don't have 9 to check.
>
>You will still have to deal with the compiler trying to pull in the
>runtime code.
Additionally, COM files are non-relocatable and based at address
0x100. If you load them anywhere else they don't work.
George
[COM files can load anywhere in memory, sinec DOS sets the CS register
to point at where they're loaded. If they're more than 64K, they do have
to do their own segment register management. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.