Re: open64 versus gcc

"shrey" <shreyas76@gmail.com>
24 Nov 2006 08:20:47 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
open64 versus gcc drizzle76@gmail.com (dz) (2006-11-22)
Re: open64 versus gcc shreyas76@gmail.com (shrey) (2006-11-24)
Re: open64 versus gcc touati.sid-pas-de-spam-svp@gmail.com-pasdespam (touati) (2006-11-24)
Re: open64 versus gcc stevenb.gcc@gmail.com (Steven Bosscher) (2006-11-26)
Re: open64 versus gcc Sid-pasdespam.Touati@inria.fr (Sid Touati) (2006-11-27)
Re: open64 versus gcc drizzle76@gmail.com (dz) (2006-11-29)
Re: open64 versus gcc dnovillo@redhat.com (Diego Novillo) (2006-11-29)
Re: open64 versus gcc alewando@fala2005.com (A.L.) (2006-12-01)
[7 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "shrey" <shreyas76@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 24 Nov 2006 08:20:47 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 06-11-094
Keywords: GCC, performance
Posted-Date: 24 Nov 2006 08:20:47 EST

One advantage that gcc has over open64 is the variety of architecures
especially embedded ones that it supports if that is what you are
interested. Perhaps somebody can add to if open64 does that as well.


Shrey


On Nov 22, 6:17 pm, "dz" <drizzl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
> Can any one give me some opinion on how these two compilers compare
> in terms of the optimizations they have ? Also can any one comment on
> the stability experience they may have had with these compilers.
>
> Any pointers or answers will be highly appreciated
>
> thanks
> dz


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.