Re: open64 versus gcc

touati <touati.sid-pas-de-spam-svp@gmail.com-pasdespam>
24 Nov 2006 08:21:12 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
open64 versus gcc drizzle76@gmail.com (dz) (2006-11-22)
Re: open64 versus gcc shreyas76@gmail.com (shrey) (2006-11-24)
Re: open64 versus gcc touati.sid-pas-de-spam-svp@gmail.com-pasdespam (touati) (2006-11-24)
Re: open64 versus gcc stevenb.gcc@gmail.com (Steven Bosscher) (2006-11-26)
Re: open64 versus gcc Sid-pasdespam.Touati@inria.fr (Sid Touati) (2006-11-27)
Re: open64 versus gcc drizzle76@gmail.com (dz) (2006-11-29)
Re: open64 versus gcc dnovillo@redhat.com (Diego Novillo) (2006-11-29)
Re: open64 versus gcc alewando@fala2005.com (A.L.) (2006-12-01)
Re: open64 versus gcc alewando@fala2005.com (A.L.) (2006-12-01)
[6 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: touati <touati.sid-pas-de-spam-svp@gmail.com-pasdespam>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 24 Nov 2006 08:21:12 -0500
Organization: Universite de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
References: 06-11-094
Keywords: GCC, performance

dz a écrit :
> Hi
> Can any one give me some opinion on how these two compilers compare
> in terms of the optimizations they have ? Also can any one comment on
> the stability experience they may have had with these compilers.
>
> Any pointers or answers will be highly appreciated
>
> thanks
> dz
>
Actually, Open64 produces better code than gcc.
Open64 is programmed in C++, while gcc is programmed in C.
Open64 is not as maintained as gcc.
gcc has more backends compared to Open64.
The gcc comunity is larger, but this is not a quality criteria.


S



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.