Re: simple vs complex languages

Yiorgos Adamopoulos <adamo+news@dblab.ece.ntua.gr>
5 Jun 2003 23:14:12 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[33 earlier articles]
Re: simple vs complex languages bear@sonic.net (2003-06-03)
Re: simple vs complex languages lars@bearnip.com (2003-06-03)
Re: simple vs complex languages jvorbrueggen@mediasec.de (Jan C.=?iso-8859-1?Q?Vorbr=FCggen?=) (2003-06-05)
Re: simple vs complex languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-06-05)
Re: simple vs complex languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-06-05)
Re: simple vs complex languages chase@TheWorld.com (David Chase) (2003-06-05)
Re: simple vs complex languages adamo+news@dblab.ece.ntua.gr (Yiorgos Adamopoulos) (2003-06-05)
Re: simple vs complex languages david.thompson1@worldnet.att.net (Dave Thompson) (2003-06-05)
Re: simple vs complex languages lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2003-06-05)
Re: simple vs complex languages zivca@netvision.net.il (2003-06-08)
Re: simple vs complex languages bear@sonic.net (2003-06-08)
Re: simple vs complex languages lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2003-06-20)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Yiorgos Adamopoulos <adamo+news@dblab.ece.ntua.gr>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 5 Jun 2003 23:14:12 -0400
Organization: [I have a] Bad Temper Inc.
References: 03-04-095 03-04-112 03-05-006 03-06-011
Keywords: design
Posted-Date: 05 Jun 2003 23:14:12 EDT

  Lars Duening wrote:
> In other words: unless we develop and use programming languages with
> concepts not suitably expressable through plain text, there is not
> much need to go beyond editing of plain text files.


Is colorForth such a language?
--
#include <std/disclaimer.h> /* adamo+news@dblab.ece.ntua.gr */


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.