Related articles |
---|
[33 earlier articles] |
Re: simple vs complex languages bear@sonic.net (2003-06-03) |
Re: simple vs complex languages lars@bearnip.com (2003-06-03) |
Re: simple vs complex languages jvorbrueggen@mediasec.de (Jan C.=?iso-8859-1?Q?Vorbr=FCggen?=) (2003-06-05) |
Re: simple vs complex languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-06-05) |
Re: simple vs complex languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2003-06-05) |
Re: simple vs complex languages chase@TheWorld.com (David Chase) (2003-06-05) |
Re: simple vs complex languages adamo+news@dblab.ece.ntua.gr (Yiorgos Adamopoulos) (2003-06-05) |
Re: simple vs complex languages david.thompson1@worldnet.att.net (Dave Thompson) (2003-06-05) |
Re: simple vs complex languages lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2003-06-05) |
Re: simple vs complex languages zivca@netvision.net.il (2003-06-08) |
Re: simple vs complex languages bear@sonic.net (2003-06-08) |
Re: simple vs complex languages lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2003-06-20) |
From: | Yiorgos Adamopoulos <adamo+news@dblab.ece.ntua.gr> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 5 Jun 2003 23:14:12 -0400 |
Organization: | [I have a] Bad Temper Inc. |
References: | 03-04-095 03-04-112 03-05-006 03-06-011 |
Keywords: | design |
Posted-Date: | 05 Jun 2003 23:14:12 EDT |
Lars Duening wrote:
> In other words: unless we develop and use programming languages with
> concepts not suitably expressable through plain text, there is not
> much need to go beyond editing of plain text files.
Is colorForth such a language?
--
#include <std/disclaimer.h> /* adamo+news@dblab.ece.ntua.gr */
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.