Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction

zivca@netvision.net.il (Ziv Caspi)
27 Apr 2003 02:22:36 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[7 earlier articles]
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction rpboland@math.uwaterloo.ca (Ralph P. Boland) (2003-04-15)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction cfc@TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2003-04-15)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-04-20)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2003-04-20)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2003-04-27)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction rpboland@math.uwaterloo.ca (Ralph P. Boland) (2003-04-27)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction zivca@netvision.net.il (2003-04-27)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-04-27)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: zivca@netvision.net.il (Ziv Caspi)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 27 Apr 2003 02:22:36 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 03-02-125 03-02-147 03-03-043 03-03-061 03-03-103 03-04-006 03-04-028 03-04-046 03-04-066
Keywords: parse, practice
Posted-Date: 27 Apr 2003 02:22:36 EDT

>[I don't see why it's artificial. Human languages have very complex
>grammars. That's how we're wired to work. Why shouldn't computers
>adapt to us for a change? -John]


Human language complexity comes at a cost: a sentence in the language
can (and often does) have multiple different interpretations,
depending on how you "parse" it.


Ziv

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.