Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction

Joachim Durchholz <joachim_d@gmx.de>
13 Apr 2003 12:17:49 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[8 earlier articles]
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2003-03-14)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction tbandrow@unitedsoftworks.com (2003-03-16)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction tbandrow@unitedsoftworks.com (2003-03-16)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2003-03-17)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction david.cornelson@iflibrary.com (David A. Cornelson) (2003-03-17)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction JeffKenton@attbi.com (Jeff Kenton) (2003-04-05)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-04-13)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction rpboland@math.uwaterloo.ca (Ralph P. Boland) (2003-04-15)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction cfc@TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2003-04-15)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2003-04-20)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2003-04-20)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2003-04-27)
Re: parsing, was .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction rpboland@math.uwaterloo.ca (Ralph P. Boland) (2003-04-27)
[12 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Joachim Durchholz <joachim_d@gmx.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 13 Apr 2003 12:17:49 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 03-02-125 03-02-147 03-03-043 03-03-061 03-03-103 03-04-006
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 13 Apr 2003 12:17:48 EDT

John wrote:
> [Parsing has indeed been well studied. The main changes in recent
> years is that algorithms that used to be considered too slow for
> production use aren't any more. -John]


Well, Kannapinn's recent work is still a noticeable improvement in LR
parsing, so there *is* progress in this area. But I agree that things
have come to a near-standstill, problems are either solved or
known/assumed to be unsolvable. Research has moved on to other topics.


Regards,
Joachim
--
Currently looking for a new job.

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.