Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction

"David A. Cornelson" <david.cornelson@iflibrary.com>
14 Mar 2003 11:18:58 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
.NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction david.cornelson@iflibrary.com (David A. Cornelson) (2003-02-21)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2003-02-24)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction neelk@alum.mit.edu (Neelakantan Krishnaswami) (2003-02-24)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction david.cornelson@iflibrary.com (David A. Cornelson) (2003-03-09)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction tbandrow@unitedsoftworks.com (2003-03-09)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction neelk@alum.mit.edu (Neelakantan Krishnaswami) (2003-03-14)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction lars@bearnip.com (2003-03-14)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction david.cornelson@iflibrary.com (David A. Cornelson) (2003-03-14)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction marcov@toad.stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2003-03-14)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction tbandrow@unitedsoftworks.com (2003-03-16)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction tbandrow@unitedsoftworks.com (2003-03-16)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction lex@cc.gatech.edu (Lex Spoon) (2003-03-17)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction david.cornelson@iflibrary.com (David A. Cornelson) (2003-03-17)
Re: .NET Compiler for Interactive Fiction JeffKenton@attbi.com (Jeff Kenton) (2003-04-05)
[19 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "David A. Cornelson" <david.cornelson@iflibrary.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 14 Mar 2003 11:18:58 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 03-02-125 03-02-147 03-03-043
Keywords: design
Posted-Date: 14 Mar 2003 11:18:58 EST

"tj bandrowsky" <tbandrow@unitedsoftworks.com> wrote in message
> See I don't know that he wants a code expander and the idea of writing
> his own compiler to the CLR is rather intriguing. If anything, his
> DSL would not be limited in a lot of ways because he could easily
> expose the entire .NET framework to developers using his DSL.


This is exactly the thought process I'm going through. This is what
makes the CLR so interesting. Of couse now that I've actually read
through a couple of compiler books, I'm not sure I should even be
talking about this. Until I find a true compiler person interested in
helping me, I doubt I'll get anywhere.


But I can work at it in the meantime. The syntax is what really
interests me. How to create a syntax that supports a 10 to 1 or higher
ratio of descriptive text to code. The only thing close is HTML and a
markup type language isn't a terrible idea, it just may not be
suitable.


Still working...


David


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.