Re: alternatives to java byte-codes

Jesus Cea Avion <jcea@argo.es>
10 Feb 1999 18:11:19 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
alternatives to java byte-codes jafrutos@eui.upm.es (Juan Alberto de Frutos Velasco) (1999-01-27)
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes olivier.lefevre@wdr.com (Olivier Lefevre) (1999-01-31)
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes niall@cuc.ucc.ie (Niall Dalton) (1999-02-01)
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes dgay@barnowl.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David Gay) (1999-02-03)
Re: alternatives to Java byte-codes jerpat@iastate.edu (1999-02-05)
Re: alternatives to Java byte-codes kistler@ics.uci.edu (Thomas Kistler) (1999-02-07)
Re: alternatives to Java byte-codes Paulo@PlanetSmart.com (Paulo Machado) (1999-02-10)
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes jcea@argo.es (Jesus Cea Avion) (1999-02-10)
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes niall@cuc.ucc.ie (Niall Dalton) (1999-02-12)
Re: alternatives to java byte-codes chase@world.std.com (David Chase) (1999-02-15)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Jesus Cea Avion <jcea@argo.es>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 10 Feb 1999 18:11:19 -0500
Organization: Argo Redes y Servicios Telematicos, S.A.
References: 99-01-096 99-02-006
Keywords: Java
X-Accept-Language: es,en,gl

> http://www.ics.uci.edu/~franz/
> http://www.ics.uci.edu/~juice/intro.html


Very nice works. I miss some details, but docs are interesting.


What about "reverse engineering" and "decompilation" issues?. Java is
problematic in those issues since bytecodes give many details about
source, necessary for the "dinamic binding" at runtime. If "Slim
Binaries" are yet closer to source code, beware coding a "programming
for profit" product.


--
Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/
jcea@argo.es http://www.argo.es/~jcea/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.