Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs

"Quinn Tyler Jackson" <qjackson@wave.home.com>
4 Oct 1998 00:47:28 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[26 earlier articles]
Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs luddy@concmp.com (Luddy Harrison) (1998-09-29)
Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs tim@wagner.princeton.edu (1998-09-29)
Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs dmr@bell-labs.com (Dennis Ritchie) (1998-09-29)
Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs dmr@bell-labs.com (Dennis Ritchie) (1998-09-29)
Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs zalman@netcom.com (1998-10-01)
Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs wclodius@aol.com (1998-10-01)
Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs qjackson@wave.home.com (Quinn Tyler Jackson) (1998-10-04)
Re: inlining + optimization = nuisance bugs luddy@concmp.com (Luddy Harrison) (1998-10-04)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Quinn Tyler Jackson" <qjackson@wave.home.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 4 Oct 1998 00:47:28 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 98-09-149 98-09-16398-09-171 98-09-172
Keywords: arithmetic

>"Floating point numbers are like sandpiles; every time
>you move one you lose a little sand and pick up a little dirt"
>
>Kernighan just assured me that it was indeed Vic Vyssotsky
>from whom the quote was taken (my backup guess was Hamming).


Poorly optimized floating point operations, then, would be like sand
turned into glass -- shiny and bright, and may even be useful for
holding a bit of water, but every time you get near one, you get cut.


--
Quinn Tyler Jackson


email: qjackson@wave.home.com
url: http://www.qtj.net/~quinn/
ftp: qtj.net


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.