Related articles |
---|
Which target language do I choose? Thomas.Mork.Farrelly@nho.hydro.com (Thomas Mork Farrelly) (1998-07-10) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? henry@spsystems.net (1998-07-13) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? wclodius@aol.com (1998-07-17) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? andrew@openkast.com (Andrew Cruickshank) (1998-07-17) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl (Toon Moene) (1998-07-20) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? conway@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1998-07-20) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? albaugh@agames.com (1998-07-20) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? mark@msm.cam.ac.uk (1998-07-24) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? cts@bangkok.office.cdsnet.net (1998-07-26) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? henry@spsystems.net (1998-07-27) |
[1 later articles] |
From: | Andrew Cruickshank <andrew@openkast.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 17 Jul 1998 10:05:52 -0400 |
Organization: | OpenKast Limited |
References: | 98-07-094 98-07-109 |
Keywords: | practice, portable |
Henry Spencer wrote:
> Pascal might be a serious contender, but it's somewhat less common
> than the other possible candidates, the compilers are often mediocre,
> and the language is somewhat limited here and there. It has often
> been extended to get around them, but then the Death Of A Thousand
> Dialects problem appears.
There is only one major dialect of Pascal left in terms of major use:
Object Pascal as provided with Delphi and also compiled by
Inprise/Borland's C++ Builder products.
Moreover there is Free Pascal that is a couple of minor versions
behind the current commercial Object Pascal.
http://www.brain.uni-freiburg.de/~klaus/fpc/
Source is available. DOS and x86 Linux targets.
-----------------
Andrew.
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.