Related articles |
---|
Which target language do I choose? Thomas.Mork.Farrelly@nho.hydro.com (Thomas Mork Farrelly) (1998-07-10) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? henry@spsystems.net (1998-07-13) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? wclodius@aol.com (1998-07-17) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? andrew@openkast.com (Andrew Cruickshank) (1998-07-17) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl (Toon Moene) (1998-07-20) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? conway@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1998-07-20) |
Re: Which target language do I choose? albaugh@agames.com (1998-07-20) |
[4 later articles] |
From: | Thomas Mork Farrelly <Thomas.Mork.Farrelly@nho.hydro.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 10 Jul 1998 21:04:07 -0400 |
Organization: | Norsk Hydro |
Keywords: | design, question, comment |
I'm designing a compiler for a general programming language ( an eiffel
kind of language ).
I want the compiler not to output assembler or machinecode, so I'll
choose a different language.
My current choice is C, and it is fully adequate for the job, but I like
to consider other possibilities.
I need the following properties:
Have structures and/or arrays equivalent to those in C.
A minimalistic, no fuzz, memory footprint.
There should exist a compiler for the language that can generate
PC-relative code.
Calling of functions through pointers.
Portable to many platforms.
Thanks in advance.
[I doubt you'll find anything else that meets those criteria as well
as C does. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.