Related articles |
---|
Earley... darius@phidani.be (Darius Blasband) (1997-05-22) |
Re: Earley... vannoord@let.rug.nl (1997-05-25) |
Re: Earley... lijnzaad@ebi.ac.uk (Philip Lijnzaad) (1997-05-27) |
Re: Earley... alan@ezlink.com (Alan L. Wendt) (1997-05-30) |
Re: Earley... clark@quarry.zk3.dec.com (1997-06-04) |
From: | vannoord@let.rug.nl (Gertjan van Noord) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 25 May 1997 13:45:32 -0400 |
Organization: | University of Groningen, Faculty of Arts |
References: | 97-05-252 |
Keywords: | parse |
Darius Blasband (darius@phidani.be) wrote:
> Hello !
> I'd be interested in any experience or technical information about
> Earley's parsing algorithm. More specifically:
> - How does one explain the huge difference between the theoretical
> complexity (often linear or quadratic, cubic worst case) and
> the real performance (quite bad, if I recall)
Earley is efficient for _general_ context free grammars, but it is
less efficient then e.g. LR(1) which only deals with a subset of
the context-free grammars.
> - Is it true that (some or all) Eiffel parsers use Earley's
> algorithm ?
> - Is there a yacc-like tool that supports Earley's algorithm, even
> if it does not support semantic actions a la yacc ?
> - Does anyone use it in practice ?
Earley's algorithm and many variations of it are used in natural language
processing, because there one is often interested in languages which are
not LR(k).
--
dr Gertjan van Noord Alfa-informatica, RUG, Postbus 716, 9700 AS Groningen
vannoord@let.rug.nl tel. +31-50-3635935 fax +31-50-3636855
http://www.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.