Related articles |
---|
Earley... darius@phidani.be (Darius Blasband) (1997-05-22) |
Re: Earley... vannoord@let.rug.nl (1997-05-25) |
Re: Earley... lijnzaad@ebi.ac.uk (Philip Lijnzaad) (1997-05-27) |
Re: Earley... alan@ezlink.com (Alan L. Wendt) (1997-05-30) |
Re: Earley... clark@quarry.zk3.dec.com (1997-06-04) |
From: | Darius Blasband <darius@phidani.be> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 22 May 1997 22:25:56 -0400 |
Organization: | Phidani Software, Brussels |
Keywords: | parse, question |
Hello !
I'd be interested in any experience or technical information about
Earley's parsing algorithm. More specifically:
- How does one explain the huge difference between the theoretical
complexity (often linear or quadratic, cubic worst case) and
the real performance (quite bad, if I recall)
- Is it true that (some or all) Eiffel parsers use Earley's
algorithm ?
- Is there a yacc-like tool that supports Earley's algorithm, even
if it does not support semantic actions a la yacc ?
- Does anyone use it in practice ?
Thanks.
Darius.
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.