Re: Multiple return values

Robert.Harley@inria.fr (Robert Harley)
4 May 1997 22:08:14 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[18 earlier articles]
Re: Multiple return values burley@tweedledumb.cygnus.com (Craig Burley) (1997-04-22)
Re: Multiple return values albaugh@agames.com (1997-04-22)
Re: Multiple return values tiggr@es.ele.tue.nl (1997-04-30)
Re: Multiple return values jch@hazel.pwd.hp.com (John Haxby) (1997-05-04)
Re: Multiple return values jan@digicomp.com (Jan Galkowski) (1997-05-04)
Re: Multiple return values gscase@interact.net.au (1997-05-04)
Re: Multiple return values Robert.Harley@inria.fr (1997-05-04)
Re: Multiple return values tim@franck.Princeton.EDU (1997-05-04)
Re: Multiple return values jens.hansson@mailbox.swipnet.se (1997-05-04)
Re: Multiple return values jamesl@netcom.com (1997-05-08)
Re: Multiple return values hbaker@netcom.com (1997-05-08)
Re: Multiple return values mark@omnifest.uwm.edu (1997-05-13)
Re: Multiple return values bear@sonic.net (Ray Dillinger) (1997-05-13)
[5 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Robert.Harley@inria.fr (Robert Harley)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,comp.lang.misc
Date: 4 May 1997 22:08:14 -0400
Organization: I.N.R.I.A Rocquencourt
References: 97-04-091 97-04-109 97-04-138 97-04-148 97-04-166
Keywords: design, C, standards

albaugh@agames.com (Mike Albaugh) writes:
>Robert Harley (Robert.Harley@inria.fr) wrote:
>>[...] What about something like:
>
>/* Sails off into undefined behavior ... :-) */


Please avoid confusing "undefined" with "implementation defined".


NB: the five implementations of the C language that I use happen to
        specify the same behaviour for that piece of code.


-- Rob.
          .-. Robert.Harley@inria.fr .-.
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.