Related articles |
---|
Lots of things are happening with ACM TOPLAS toplas@cs.umd.edu (1997-03-31) |
gawk memory leak [was Re: Lots of things are happening with ACM TOPLAS arnold@mathcs.emory.edu (1997-04-02) |
Re: gawk memory leak albaugh@agames.com (1997-04-03) |
Re: gawk memory leak bobduff@world.std.com (1997-04-06) |
Re: gawk memory leak pfoxSPAMOFF@lehman.com (Paul David Fox) (1997-04-13) |
Purify patent (was Re: gawk memory leak) elan@jeeves.net (Elan Feingold) (1997-05-04) |
Re: Purify patent (was Re: gawk memory leak) krish@cs.purdue.edu (Sailesh Krishnamurthy) (1997-05-08) |
Re: Purify patent (was Re: gawk memory leak) clark@quarry.zk3.dec.com (1997-05-08) |
Re: Purify patent (was Re: gawk memory leak) dds@flavors.com (Duncan Smith) (1997-05-09) |
Re: Purify patent (was Re: gawk memory leak) pfox@lehman.com (Paul David Fox) (1997-05-13) |
Re: Purify patent (was Re: gawk memory leak) boehm@mti.mti.sgi.com (Hans-Juergen Boehm) (1997-05-17) |
Partial evaluation vs flow-graph analysis fabre@gr.osf.org (Christian Fabre) (1997-05-22) |
[3 later articles] |
From: | Elan Feingold <elan@jeeves.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 4 May 1997 00:22:40 -0400 |
Organization: | AetherWorks Corporation |
References: | 97-03-165 97-04-020 97-04-022 97-04-037 97-04-070 |
Keywords: | debug, legal, comment |
Paul David Fox wrote:
> I did some research into the Purify patent. There are actually 3
> inter-related ones. I havent got the reference to hand but the
> substance of the patent is 'Use of object code modification to
> facilitate memory tracking and leakage detection'.
This surprises me, as Digital has a toolkit out there called ATOM
(the OM standing for "Object Modification") and it ships a client,
who's name escapes me at the moment, that has similar features as
Purify. Anyone know the scoop on this?
Best regards,
-Elan
[Maybe they have patent cross-licenses. They're pretty common. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.