Related articles |
---|
Left and Right recursive non-terminals cowboy@cv.lexington.ibm.com (1996-12-14) |
Re: Left and Right recursive non-terminals bart@time.cirl.uoregon.edu (1996-12-15) |
Re: Left and Right recursive non-terminals dlmoore@ix.netcom.com (David L Moore) (1996-12-15) |
Re: Left and Right recursive non-terminals perle@cs.tu-berlin.de (1996-12-18) |
Re: Aho and Ullman theory of parsing books adrian@dcs.rhbnc.ac.uk (1996-12-20) |
Re: Left and Right recursive non-terminals bart@time.cirl.uoregon.edu (1996-12-20) |
Re: Left and Right recursive non-terminals vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl (Horst von Brand) (1996-12-26) |
From: | cowboy@cv.lexington.ibm.com |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 14 Dec 1996 00:39:16 -0500 |
Organization: | IBM T.J. Watson Research Center |
Keywords: | parse, theory, question |
The recent discussions on LL(k) has reminded me of a topic I can no longer
find...
I'm sure I read somewhere that a non-terminal that is both left and right
recursive renders the grammar ambiguous (I think for any k).
Was I dreaming? I can't locate a reference in any of my papers here, and
a perusal through both dragon books didn't turn up anything - though at
those hours, I could've missed a semi ;ª}
Thanks,
Rick Nelson
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.