Re: code transformations?

kaz@nt.com
3 Oct 1996 22:56:40 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[3 earlier articles]
Re: code transformations? ma@camcon.co.uk (1996-09-25)
Re: code transformations? darius@phidani.be (Darius Blasband) (1996-09-26)
Re: code transformations? meulenbr@prl.philips.nl (1996-09-26)
Re: code transformations? albaugh@agames.com (1996-09-26)
Re: code transformations? torbenm@diku.dk (1996-09-29)
Re: code transformations? ndc@icanect.net (Norman Culver) (1996-09-29)
Re: code transformations? kaz@nt.com (1996-10-03)
Re: code transformations? hdlambri@cs.arizona.edu (Henry Dan Lambright) (1996-10-20)
Re: code transformations? hogan@rintintin.Colorado.EDU (1996-10-24)
Re: code transformations? bill@amber.ssd.csd.harris.com (1996-10-24)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: kaz@nt.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 3 Oct 1996 22:56:40 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 96-09-094 96-09-111
Keywords: tools

Michael Andersen <ma@camcon.co.uk> wrote:
> CodeShroud (?) from Gimpel Software (the Lint people) will do various
> semantics preserving operations such as turning while() and for() loops into
> labelled goto: structures in addition to the mangled names.


Of course, these are _clarifying_ transformations to some programmers, who
would view such a program as a code beautifier.


--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.