Related articles |
---|
[17 earlier articles] |
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) monnier@di.epfl.ch (Stefan Monnier) (1995-05-11) |
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) cef@geodesic.com (Charles Fiterman) (1995-05-11) |
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) plong@perf.com (1995-05-11) |
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) stidev@gate.net (1995-05-12) |
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) rabin@CS.YALE.EDU (1995-05-12) |
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) plong@perf.com (1995-05-12) |
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (1995-05-15) |
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (1995-05-15) |
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) Charles.Fiterman@bluebird.uchicago.edu (1995-05-28) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan) |
Keywords: | syntax, design |
Organization: | Department of Computer Science; University of Manchester |
References: | 95-05-014 95-05-083 |
Date: | Mon, 15 May 1995 09:48:33 GMT |
plong@perf.com (Paul Long) writes:
... One problem with specifying the character
position is what to do in the presence of macro expansion. Do you indicate
the position in the original source or in the expanded source.
I'd suggest generally the former with the option of the latter in
order to solve the really awkward problems.
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.