Re: Best, Simple versus Best

Prof Herman Venter <csabhv@upe.ac.za>
Thu, 30 Mar 1995 11:02:50 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[3 earlier articles]
Re: Best, Simple versus Best schrod@iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (1995-03-15)
Best, Simple versus Best Jon.Bertoni@Eng.Sun.COM (1995-03-15)
Re: Best, Simple versus Best hbaker@netcom.com (1995-03-16)
Re: Best, Simple versus Best oz@nexus.yorku.ca (1995-03-16)
Re: Best, Simple versus Best sdm7g@elvis.med.virginia.edu (Steven D. Majewski) (1995-03-20)
Re: Best, Simple versus Best leichter@zodiac.rutgers.edu (1995-03-21)
Re: Best, Simple versus Best csabhv@upe.ac.za (Prof Herman Venter) (1995-03-30)
Best, Simple versus Best preston@tera.com (1995-03-30)
Re: Best, Simple versus Best ryg@summit.novell.com (1995-04-15)
Re: Best, Simple versus Best ryg@summit.novell.com (1995-04-07)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: Prof Herman Venter <csabhv@upe.ac.za>
Keywords: optimize, design
Organization: University of Port Elizabeth
References: 95-03-050 95-03-116
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 11:02:50 GMT

> >The entire discussion to this point reminds me of an essay by Richard
> >Gabriel (I'm sorry I don't have even a minimal reference) contrasting
> >the "MIT/Stanford style of design" with the "New Jersey approach."


The document is also available as:


  http://cbl.leeds.ac.uk/nikos/tex2html/examples/good-bad-win/good-bad-win.html
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.