Related articles |
---|
Re: DOS to UNIX shell translator? Stephen.Darlington@durham.ac.uk (Stephen Darlington) (1994-08-05) |
Re: DOS to UNIX shell translator? dtrg@st-andrews.ac.uk (1994-08-07) |
Re: DOS to UNIX shell translator? ok@cs.rmit.oz.au (1994-08-18) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | dtrg@st-andrews.ac.uk (David Thomas Richard Given) |
Keywords: | translator |
Organization: | University Of St. Andrews |
References: | 94-08-060 |
Date: | Sun, 7 Aug 1994 17:48:45 GMT |
Status: | RO |
Stephen Darlington <Stephen.Darlington@durham.ac.uk> wrote:
>I need to translate between UNIX and DOS (and back) shells for my third
>year computing project - so a sh like shell for DOS would not be of use.
>Current opinion (my own and of people who have replied - thanks and sorry
>for not replying by the way) suggest that I should use the Bourne shell.
I think you aren't going to be able to convert sh > .BAT, because sh
scripts are a lot more powerful that .BAT files. For example, how are you
going to convert multi-line ifs, switch statements, and back-quotes into
.BAT files? However, .BAT > sh should be easy enough; the only slight
difficulty may be due to GOTOs. Does sh support goto? (Never use it, so
never wanted to find out :)
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.