Re: Why do we still assemble?

Stephen J Bevan <bevan@cs.man.ac.uk>
Mon, 18 Apr 1994 08:02:49 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[33 earlier articles]
Re: Why do we still assemble? djohnson@arnold.ucsd.edu (1994-04-15)
Re: Why do we still assemble? philw@tempel.research.att.com (1994-04-15)
Re: Why do we still assemble? pardo@cs.washington.edu (1994-04-15)
Re: Why do we still assemble? wirzeniu@cc.helsinki.fi (Lars Wirzenius) (1994-04-16)
Re: Why do we still assemble? hbaker@netcom.com (1994-04-16)
Re: Why do we still assemble? hrubin@b.stat.purdue.edu (1994-04-17)
Re: Why do we still assemble? bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan) (1994-04-18)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: Stephen J Bevan <bevan@cs.man.ac.uk>
Keywords: linker, bibliography
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 94-04-114
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 1994 08:02:49 GMT

      ... I read this for a course I'm taking; I don't know whether the authors
      are the inventors or whether this is state of the art, but what they
      describe sounds very nice.


Quong, Russel W., Linton, Mark A.,
"Linking Programs Incrementally",
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems,
Vol 13, No 1, Jan 1991, p. 1--20.


Besides reading the paper, I think it is well worth reading the review
of it in Computing Reviews 9208-0594. The reviewer makes some
interesting points.
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.