Related articles |
---|
LALR(k) lookahead set algorithms tbr@tfic.bc.ca (1993-04-16) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | tbr@tfic.bc.ca (Tom Rushworth ) |
Keywords: | LALR, bibliography |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Date: | Fri, 16 Apr 1993 03:40:00 GMT |
There was a series of papers several years back in TOPLAS and SIGPLAN Notices
about improved algorithms for LALR(1) lookahead set generation:
1982 October - TOPLAS vol 4 # 4,
"Efficient Computation of LALR(1) Look-Ahead Sets",
DeRemer and Pennello
1985 January - TOPLAS vol 7 # 1,
"A New Analysis of LALR Formalisms",
Park, Choe and Chang
1986 July - SIGPLAN Notices vol 21 # 7, (Proceedings of the SIGPLAN'86
Symposium on Compiler Construction)
"Unifying View of recent LALR(1) Lookahead Set Algorithms"
Ives
1987 April - SIGPLAN Notices vol 22 # 4,
"Remarks on Recent Algorithms for LALR Lookahead Sets"
Park and Choe
1987 August - SIGPLAN Notices vol 22 # 8,
"Response to Remarks on Recent Algorithms for LALR Lookahead Sets"
Ives
I implemented the original DeRemer and Pennello algorithm, but I'm rusty
enough on the subject that I found the later papers heavy going. Does
anyone know if Fred Ives published a more detailed paper later? The
August'87 paper mentions a paper submitted to TOPLAS, but if it was
accepted, I've missed it.
The point of all this is that I'm thinking of implementing either the
Park, Choe and Chang algorithm or the Ives algorithm, and I want as clear
an explanation as I can get. Any pointers or suggestions will be
appreciated!
----
Tom Rushworth (604) 733-0731 [FAX: 733-0634] e-mail: tbr@tfic.bc.ca {VE7TBR}
Timberline Forest Inventory Consultants
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.