Related articles |
---|
LR(0) vs. LALR, and the Great Parsing War eifrig@beanworld.cs.jhu.edu (1992-08-30) |
Re: LR(0) vs. LALR, and the Great Parsing War goer@midway.uchicago.edu (1992-08-31) |
Re: LR(0) vs. LALR, and the Great Parsing War goer@midway.uchicago.edu (1992-09-02) |
Re: LR(0) vs. LALR, and the Great Parsing War markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (1992-09-05) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | goer@midway.uchicago.edu (Richard L. Goerwitz) |
Organization: | University of Chicago Computing Organizations |
Date: | Wed, 2 Sep 1992 00:47:47 GMT |
References: | 92-08-179 92-09-011 |
Keywords: | parse, LALR, comment |
Richard L. Goerwitz writes:
>Yes and no. If this were true, then Tomita's algorithm would have a cubic
>worst-case time factor. He uses a graph-structured parse forest, though,
>and claims polynomial time.
Exponential time factor, I mean. Not "cubic"!
--
-Richard L. Goerwitz goer%midway@uchicago.bitnet
goer@midway.uchicago.edu rutgers!oddjob!ellis!goer
[Oops, shoulda caught that. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.