Related articles |
---|
LR(0) vs. LALR, and the Great Parsing War eifrig@beanworld.cs.jhu.edu (1992-08-30) |
Re: LR(0) vs. LALR, and the Great Parsing War goer@midway.uchicago.edu (1992-08-31) |
Re: LR(0) vs. LALR, and the Great Parsing War goer@midway.uchicago.edu (1992-09-02) |
Re: LR(0) vs. LALR, and the Great Parsing War markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (1992-09-05) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | goer@midway.uchicago.edu (Richard L. Goerwitz) |
Organization: | University of Chicago Computing Organizations |
Date: | Mon, 31 Aug 1992 17:20:54 GMT |
References: | 92-08-179 |
Keywords: | parse |
Jonathan Eifrig writes:
> This seems quite surprising to me, given that Tomita's algorithm
>basically has to spin off on the fly new parsing automatons to follow each
>possible path in a derivation.
Yes and no. If this were true, then Tomita's algorithm would have a cubic
worst-case time factor. He uses a graph-structured parse forest, though,
and claims polynomial time.
--
-Richard L. Goerwitz goer%midway@uchicago.bitnet
goer@midway.uchicago.edu rutgers!oddjob!ellis!goer
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.