Related articles |
---|
language design references wanted grosen@mhd1.moorhead.msus.edu (1991-08-21) |
Re: language design references wanted acha@CS.CMU.EDU (1991-08-22) |
Re: language design references wanted tjj@thumper.bellcore.com (1991-08-26) |
Re: language design references wanted grosen@mhd1.moorhead.msus.edu (1991-08-26) |
Re: language design references wanted murphy@mips.com (1991-08-29) |
Re: language design references wanted preston@helena.rice.edu (1991-08-30) |
Re: language design references wanted wendl@munich.enet.dec.com (1991-08-30) |
Re: language design references wanted salomon@ccu.umanitoba.ca (1991-09-03) |
Language design David.Chase@Eng.Sun.COM (1991-09-04) |
Re: language design references wanted ea08+@andrew.cmu.edu (Eric A. Anderson) (1991-09-04) |
Re: language design references wanted henry@zoo.toronto.edu (1991-09-05) |
Re: language design references wanted salomon@ccu.umanitoba.ca (1991-09-06) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | preston@helena.rice.edu (Preston Briggs) |
Keywords: | design |
Organization: | Rice University, Houston |
References: | 91-08-112 91-08-138 91-08-147 |
Date: | Fri, 30 Aug 91 02:08:12 GMT |
murphy@mips.com (Mike Murphy) writes:
>Also, in response to some other poster who recommended against designing a
>new language: although I would agree that the chances are that any
>language you develop would never be used, I still think it is a fun and
>educational exercise to develop a new language.
I usually think of language design as "The Pit of Despair".
You _do_ learn a lot, but I find it really hard to come up with something
that I personally would use (not to mention actually attracting a genuine
user community).
At any rate, the local lore is that compiler writers should _not_ design
languages. Instead, they should be confined to tiny cages and forced to
implement the language as specified, dammit. Sort of a corollary of the
old adage "give them an inch, they'll take a mile".
Preston Briggs
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.