Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :)

gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu>
Thu, 5 Jan 2023 16:26:47 -0800 (PST)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Compilers :) deavmi@redxen.eu (Tristan B. Velloza Kildaire) (2023-01-02)
Re: Compilers :) spibou@gmail.com (Spiros Bousbouras) (2023-01-02)
Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :) stephenjohnlimb@gmail.com (Steve Limb) (2023-01-03)
Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :) gah4@u.washington.edu (gah4) (2023-01-03)
Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :) arnold@skeeve.com (2023-01-04)
Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :) gah4@u.washington.edu (gah4) (2023-01-04)
Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :) marblypup@yahoo.co.uk (marb...@yahoo.co.uk) (2023-01-05)
Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :) gah4@u.washington.edu (gah4) (2023-01-05)
Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :) david.brown@hesbynett.no (David Brown) (2023-01-06)
Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :) marblypup@yahoo.co.uk (marb...@yahoo.co.uk) (2023-01-07)
Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :) david.brown@hesbynett.no (David Brown) (2023-01-08)
Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :) DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2023-01-09)
Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :) 864-117-4973@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2023-01-09)
Re: another C-like language? was Compilers :) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com (Keith Thompson) (2023-01-09)
[12 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 16:26:47 -0800 (PST)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 23-01-001 23-01-002 23-01-003 23-01-008
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="36844"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: C, tools
Posted-Date: 05 Jan 2023 19:29:40 EST
In-Reply-To: 23-01-008

On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 6:34:35 AM UTC-8, marb...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:


(snip)
> I'm up for reading the source of any relatively simple compiler for, and
> written in, anything C-like. I've tried making sense of the GNU C compiler a
> few times. My brain may recover one day!


Some years ago, I bought the LCC book.


The book explains it in some detail, in addition to any comments
in the code. As well as I know, it is meant for understanding.


It is especially convenient if you only what to retarget the code
generator, for a new (or existing) machine.


I have no desire to look at gcc.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.