Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ?

carlglassberg@gmail.com
Sun, 5 Jan 2020 13:59:53 -0800 (PST)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[7 earlier articles]
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? gaztoast@gmail.com (honey crisis) (2020-01-02)
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2020-01-02)
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2020-01-02)
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? rockbrentwood@gmail.com (2020-01-04)
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? gaztoast@gmail.com (honey crisis) (2020-01-05)
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? carlglassberg@gmail.com (2020-01-05)
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? carlglassberg@gmail.com (2020-01-05)
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? carlglassberg@gmail.com (2020-01-05)
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2020-01-22)
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2020-01-22)
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? carlglassberg@gmail.com (2020-01-23)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: carlglassberg@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 13:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 19-12-016 19-12-030 19-12-032 19-12-040 20-01-001 20-01-003 20-01-008
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="57841"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: syntax
Posted-Date: 06 Jan 2020 09:37:45 EST
In-Reply-To: 20-01-008

correction:
    ((a b &&))((c d & &&)) for EBNF: a { b a } c { d c }
should be:
    ((a b &&))((c d &&)) for EBNF: a { b a } c { d c }


and
    ((a b && c d & &&))
should be:
    ((a b && c d &&))


Don't know how those extraneous single "&" got there!


Carl
---



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.