Related articles |
---|
[2 earlier articles] |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2019-12-26) |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? carlglassberg@gmail.com (2019-12-29) |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? gaztoast@gmail.com (2019-12-31) |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2019-12-31) |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? carlglassberg@gmail.com (2020-01-01) |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? gaztoast@gmail.com (honey crisis) (2020-01-02) |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2020-01-02) |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2020-01-02) |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? rockbrentwood@gmail.com (2020-01-04) |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? gaztoast@gmail.com (honey crisis) (2020-01-05) |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? carlglassberg@gmail.com (2020-01-05) |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? carlglassberg@gmail.com (2020-01-05) |
Re: A minimal LL(1) parser generator ? carlglassberg@gmail.com (2020-01-05) |
[5 later articles] |
From: | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Thu, 02 Jan 2020 17:25:14 GMT |
Organization: | Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien |
References: | 19-12-016 19-12-030 19-12-032 19-12-040 20-01-001 |
Injection-Info: | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="11280"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
Keywords: | LL(1) |
Posted-Date: | 02 Jan 2020 13:21:52 EST |
carlglassberg@gmail.com writes:
>On Tuesday, December 31, 2019 at 8:42:51 AM UTC-8, Anton Ertl wrote:
>> carlglassberg@gmail.com writes:
>> >Gray's meta notation uses a postix operator "&&" for "separator list".
>...
>> >If Gray: "a b &&" ---> EBNF: "a { b a }"
...
>> >"a b && c &&"
...
>Should that be ?
>a {b a} { c a {b a}}
Yes.
>Also, would
> a b && c d &&
I assume you mean a concatenation of "a b &&" and "c d &&". In Gray
syntax that would be
(( a b && c d && ))
>parse as:
> a { b a } c { d c }
Yes.
>or as:
> a { b a } c { d a { b a } c }
If you want that, you would write it as
(( a b && c )) d &&
&& is just a binary postfix operator.
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.