Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support

rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)
Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:05:36 -0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[13 earlier articles]
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support 157-073-9834@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2018-04-10)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk (Derek M. Jones) (2018-04-10)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2018-04-11)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk (Derek M. Jones) (2018-04-11)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2018-04-12)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support bc@freeuk.com (bartc) (2018-04-12)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support rpw3@rpw3.org (2018-04-12)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support bc@freeuk.com (bartc) (2018-04-12)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2018-04-12)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2018-04-12)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2018-04-13)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2018-04-13)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (2018-05-05)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:05:36 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Rob Warnock, Consulting Systems Architect
References: <49854345-f940-e82a-5c35-35078c4189d5@gkc.org.uk> 18-04-024 18-04-034 18-04-041
Keywords: OOP, design
Originator: rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)



Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> wrote:
+---------------
| Isn't *multiple inheritance* one of the features that C++ proved
| impractical? Which other languages support multiple inheritance?
|
| DoDi
| [Lots of languages have multiple inheritance. Python is one of the
| more popular these days. As you've seen, opinions vary about how
| useful it is. -John]
+---------------


Common Lisp has multiple inheritance, as well as multiple dispatch.




-Rob


-----
Rob Warnock <rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue <http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.