Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support

Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net>
Thu, 12 Apr 2018 01:09:42 +0200

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[11 earlier articles]
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2018-04-10)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support 157-073-9834@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2018-04-10)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support 157-073-9834@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2018-04-10)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk (Derek M. Jones) (2018-04-10)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2018-04-11)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk (Derek M. Jones) (2018-04-11)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2018-04-12)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support bc@freeuk.com (bartc) (2018-04-12)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support rpw3@rpw3.org (2018-04-12)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support bc@freeuk.com (bartc) (2018-04-12)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2018-04-12)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2018-04-12)
Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2018-04-13)
[11 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 01:09:42 +0200
Organization: Compilers Central
References: <49854345-f940-e82a-5c35-35078c4189d5@gkc.org.uk> 18-03-103 18-03-042 18-03-047 18-03-075 18-03-079 18-03-101 18-04-002 18-04-003 18-04-004 18-04-024 18-04-034
Keywords: OOP, design, comment

Am 10.04.2018 um 20:32 schrieb George Neuner:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 05:48:43 GMT, anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at
> (Anton Ertl) wrote:


> Smalltalk had/has single inheritence only, and it's dynamic dispatch
> mechanism is very different from that of C++.


Isn't *multiple inheritance* one of the features that C++ proved
impractical? Which other languages support multiple inheritance?


DoDi
[Lots of languages have multiple inheritance. Python is one of the
more popular these days. As you've seen, opinions vary about how
useful it is. -John]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.