Re: [ANN] RE/flex 0.9.18 - a Flex-like lexical analyzer generator for C++

Kaz Kylheku <336-986-7787@kylheku.com>
Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:32:21 +0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[ANN] RE/flex 0.9.18 - a Flex-like lexical analyzer generator for C++ ravengelen@gmail.com (Robert van Engelen) (2017-03-27)
Re: [ANN] RE/flex 0.9.18 - a Flex-like lexical analyzer generator for cbergstrom@pathscale.com (=?UTF-8?B?QyBCZXJnc3Ryw7Zt?=) (2017-03-28)
Re: [ANN] RE/flex 0.9.18 - a Flex-like lexical analyzer generator for 336-986-7787@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2017-03-28)
Re: [ANN] RE/flex 0.9.18 - a Flex-like lexical analyzer generator for DrDiettrich1@netscape.net (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2017-03-29)
Re: [ANN] RE/flex 0.9.18 - a Flex-like lexical analyzer generator for 336-986-7787@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2017-03-29)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Kaz Kylheku <336-986-7787@kylheku.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:32:21 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
References: 17-03-013 17-03-014
Injection-Info: miucha.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="25574"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords: lex, comment
Posted-Date: 28 Mar 2017 15:27:17 EDT

On 2017-03-28, C BergstrC6m <cbergstrom@pathscale.com> wrote:
> Cool!
>
> Is this meant as a flex drop-in replacement? iirc (we) PathScale have
> sent patches to upstream Flex before and I don't remember if they were
> responsive or not. If you are 1:1 compatible, have you tried to
> replace the system flex and rebuild world or how extensively has this
> been validated? You may find the BSD community to be interested and
> empathetic if it can help them.


A nice feature in Flex might be parametrized named regexes:


You know how we can define


    ALF [A-Z]+


and later use


    {ALF}


?


OK; now what if we could have us some params:


    FOO{X} [0-9]{X}+#


then:


    {FOO Z} /* expands to [0-9](Z)+# */


Thumbs up? Down?






Multiple params def:


    FOO{X Y Z} ... {X} ... {Y}+{Z}


Multiple params ref:


    {FOO [^x] . {ALF}}


Cheers ...
[You could whip that up in an hour as a preprocessor to flex, you know. -John]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.