|ANN: lcc-win compiler firstname.lastname@example.org (jacobnavia) (2016-09-29)|
|Re: ANN: lcc-win compiler email@example.com (2016-09-30)|
|Re: ANN: lcc-win compiler firstname.lastname@example.org (jacobnavia) (2016-09-30)|
|Re: ANN: lcc-win compiler email@example.com (2016-10-01)|
|From:||firstname.lastname@example.org (Aharon Robbins)|
|Date:||Sat, 1 Oct 2016 19:57:46 -0000 (UTC)|
|Organization:||A noiseless patient Spider|
|References:||16-09-040 16-09-046 16-10-002|
|Injection-Info:||miucha.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="11455"; mail-complaints-to="email@example.com"|
|Keywords:||C, available, linux|
|Posted-Date:||01 Oct 2016 16:53:07 EDT|
In article 16-10-002, jacobnavia <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>Le 30/09/2016 ` 12:16, Aharon Robbins a icrit :
>> In article 16-09-040, jacobnavia
>>> [lcc-win] has back ends for intel (all versions), power pc, and an ARM back end
>>> is in development. It runs under linux and windows (from windows NT to windows 10)
I read this as saying that the lcc-win you distribute ran under Linux.
Sorry for the confusion.
>The versions of lcc-win that I developed for Linux are for specific
>customers and I can't distribute that. I started, some years ago trying
>to do a public version like under windows but was very quickly
>overwhelmed by the variety of distributions and bewildering software
>choices that would have needed full teams of people to solve.
>Or maybe not.
For a command line tool, it should be doable by one person. But agreed,
you should only tackle that if you want to.
>but then the whole
>IDE with the GTK core...
Understandable. There are lots of IDEs out there already though.
Does your IDE add that much value?
Aharon (Arnold) Robbins arnold AT skeeve DOT com
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.