Related articles |
---|
ANN: lcc-win compiler jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (jacobnavia) (2016-09-29) |
Re: ANN: lcc-win compiler arnold@skeeve.com (2016-09-30) |
Re: ANN: lcc-win compiler jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (jacobnavia) (2016-09-30) |
Re: ANN: lcc-win compiler arnold@skeeve.com (2016-10-01) |
From: | arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Sat, 1 Oct 2016 19:57:46 -0000 (UTC) |
Organization: | A noiseless patient Spider |
References: | 16-09-040 16-09-046 16-10-002 |
Injection-Info: | miucha.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="11455"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
Keywords: | C, available, linux |
Posted-Date: | 01 Oct 2016 16:53:07 EDT |
In article 16-10-002, jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> wrote:
>Le 30/09/2016 ` 12:16, Aharon Robbins a icrit :
>> In article 16-09-040, jacobnavia
><jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> wrote:
>>> http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32
>>>
>>> [lcc-win] has back ends for intel (all versions), power pc, and an ARM back end
>>> is in development. It runs under linux and windows (from windows NT to windows 10)
I read this as saying that the lcc-win you distribute ran under Linux.
Sorry for the confusion.
>The versions of lcc-win that I developed for Linux are for specific
>customers and I can't distribute that. I started, some years ago trying
>to do a public version like under windows but was very quickly
>overwhelmed by the variety of distributions and bewildering software
>choices that would have needed full teams of people to solve.
>
>Or maybe not.
For a command line tool, it should be doable by one person. But agreed,
you should only tackle that if you want to.
>but then the whole
>IDE with the GTK core...
>
>I stopped.
Understandable. There are lots of IDEs out there already though.
Does your IDE add that much value?
Good luck,
Arnold
--
Aharon (Arnold) Robbins arnold AT skeeve DOT com
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.