Related articles |
---|
Error-handling if your compiler had an attitude. federation2005@netzero.com (2014-12-29) |
Re: Error-handling if your compiler had an attitude. gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2014-12-30) |
Re: Error-handling if your compiler had an attitude. walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2014-12-30) |
Re: Error-handling if your compiler had an attitude. genew@telus.net (Gene Wirchenko) (2014-12-30) |
Re: Error-handling if your compiler had an attitude. christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com (Christophe de Dinechin) (2015-01-12) |
From: | glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Tue, 30 Dec 2014 02:57:36 +0000 (UTC) |
Organization: | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
References: | 14-12-010 |
Keywords: | history |
Posted-Date: | 29 Dec 2014 22:19:26 EST |
federation2005@netzero.com wrote:
> What if your compiler had an attitude problem? I was thinking of funny things
> it could do for error-handling (maybe with a -X switch for GenX/Millennial
> verbose output):
> * It addresses you like "Dude! You boffed the syntax again." or the like.
> * It tells you to get glasses if you keep missing semicolons [Note 1].
> * If you use older or archaic style (particularly, deprecated stuff), it makes
> fun of you and asks if you need help with your walker. [Note 2].
(snip)
WYLBUR: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORVYL_and_WYLBUR
has different messages that it prints on April 1st (or, at least, the
one I used to use had them) along similar lines.
-- glen
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.